From the Denver Business Journal A 2007 feasibility study done for the Colorado Water Conservation Board measured the rain that fell on northwest Douglas County and found that just 3 percent actually reached a stream. The remainder, 97 percent of the water, either evaporated or was consumed by plants in the area.
Save-a-Stream
Did you know that according to a 2006 study by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, more than two-thirds of America’s streams are in "poor" or "fair" condition. Urban sprawl, environmental changes and pollutants have damaged so many of our streams that only 28 percent are currently deemed "good." Polluted streams are characterized by murky water, lack of species diversity, poor quality of plant life along the banks, erosion, barriers to fish movement and other factors. The need to clean up our streams for future generations is a legacy worthy of our time and investment today, which is why Trout Unlimited is a proud sponsor of Outdoor Life’s Save-A-Stream program. Outdoor Life is calling on volunteers across the nation to work on restoring their local streams, whether by simply cleaning up debris or doing substantial rechanneling. And they will help with supplies and materials to guide you on your way.
As a Trout Unlimited volunteer, you may know of a stream in your area that is in need of help. Submit photos or a video by June 30, 2009 along with a written description of the neglected body of water. Submissions will receive a free stream cleaning kit (while supplies last), and have an opportunity to appear in the pages of the December/January 2010 issue of Outdoor Life. Visit Outdoor Life's website for more details and to enter.
Together with Outdoor Life, we can make a difference. David M. Rogers Director of Volunteer Operations TROUT UNLIMITED
Green Life: Sprinkler audit can slow the flow
Boulder Daily Camera
What if you could get a professional to come to your home and perform a technical audit of your sprinkler system, then help you set up the optimum watering schedule for your lawn -- and do it for free?Anyone familiar with Slow the Flow Colorado knows that's just what the program offers to residents in Boulder County and beyond.
The program runs Monday through Aug. 14. For the sixth year in a row, it's being managed by the Center for ReSource Conservation in Boulder. Read More
Today's Wilderness Podcast: David Petersen
Durango-based Dave Petersen is on the staff of the Trout Unlimited Sportsmen's Conservation Project.
David is a credible and accomplished outdoorsman who has written extensively about many of his life experiences in the ever vanishing wilderness. We discuss his book “Ghost Grizzlies”, which has recently been released in its 3rd edition, with many new photos’ and information not available before. We talk about the grizzlies that many believe may still exist in the mountains of Colorado, including the 1979 incident involving guide Ed Wiseman and the truly last known Colorado grizzly. David talks about his books “A Man Made of Elk”, “Writing Naturally” (which is a guidebook for anyone wanting to write about the outdoors) and also about a Petersen cult-classic “Racks”, including future plans to re-release much of that books information under a new handle. David shares details about his life and how they have brought him to where he is today, also discussing his very important role with Trout Unlimited.
Sportsmen praise Sec. Vilsack for calling a timeout on roadless
From Trout Unlimited DENVER—Hunters and anglers welcomed Secretary of Agriculture Tom Vilsack’s announcement Thursday calling for secretarial review of road construction or timber sales in roadless areas of the national forest system.
“Sec. Vilsack understands how important backcountry areas are to hunting, fishing, drinking water supplies and fish and wildlife habitat. His personal interest in the protection of these vital areas is welcome news to sportsmen and women across the West,” said Trout Unlimited’s Chief Operating Officer, Chris Wood.
“This is a welcome development considering the limbo many states are finding themselves in,” said David Petersen, roadless lands director for Trout Unlimited in Colorado. “Hopefully, Colorado and the Forest Service will take note of this action and use it to improve the Colorado roadless plan which, quite frankly, leaves a lot to be desired. Ideally, Gov. Ritter wouldn’t have adopted a faulty rule created by his predecessor and instead used the 2001 rule.”
Colorado and Idaho are the only two states to attempt to use the Administrative Procedures Act to create state-specific roadless land management plans Idaho’s plan is complete, and, in some cases, offers even more protection than the 2001 rule. Colorado’s rulemaking effort is still in progress, but, according to Petersen, its present draft is significantly weaker than the 2001 rule and would open up much of Colorado’s backcountry to road construction and associated development.
“Hopefully, Sec. Vilsack’s announcement will motivate Governor Ritter to take a longer look at the Colorado roadless proposal and make some needed adjustments,” Petersen said.
The Idaho roadless rule was unaffected by Vilsack’s announcement, and serves as a good template for Colorado, Wood said.
“The Idaho rule is a good example of what can happen when people apply common sense to common problems for the common good,” said Wood, a member of the U.S. Department of Agriculture’s Roadless Area Conservation National Advisory Committee. He served on the RACNAC during Idaho’s rulemaking process. “We’re pleased Secretary Vilsack chose to leave the Idaho rule in place with his new roadless policy.”
Trout Unlimited is the nation’s oldest and largest coldwater fisheries conservation organization. It has over 140,000 members dedicated to conserving, protecting and restoring North America’s trout and salmon fisheries and their watersheds.
FORESTS: One-year delay on roadless rule expected
Greenwire: (05/28/2009) Noelle Straub and Eric Bontrager, E&E reporters The Obama administration is expected to announce today that it will take a one-year delay on making any long-term decisions on the controversial Clinton-era Roadless Area Conservation Rule. Instead, the Agriculture Department secretary for the next year will have sole power to make decisions on building roads and harvesting timber on nearly all the areas covered by the 2001 rule.
During the presidential campaign, Obama expressed his support for the roadless rule, which granted blanket protection to about 58 million acres of federal land nationwide but has been mired in legal battles ever since President Clinton put it in place just before leaving office. USDA is expected to issue a memorandum immediately giving the secretary decision-making authority over the construction and reconstruction of roads and the cutting, sale or removal of timber in most of the inventoried Forest Service roadless areas.
The memo would not set any policy for the management of such areas. It includes roadless areas in Alaska, but it will not apply to those in Idaho, which wrote its own roadless area plan. Rep. Nick Rahall (D-W.Va.), chairman of the House Natural Resources Committee, praised the move. "This announcement is a major victory for our National Forests, and is proof positive that the new Administration is serious about turning the page on the legacy of the Bush Administration, which was bent on chopping away at the health and future of America's forests," Rahall said in a statement. "I see this one year time-out as a major step forward in protecting inventoried roadless areas across the country, but these wild forests need permanent protection to continue providing clean water, wildlife habitat, and boundless recreational opportunities."
A coalition of environmental groups has been urging President Obama to quickly use his administrative powers to implement the Clinton-era Roadless Area Conservation Rule. Currently, the Clinton-era rule applies to 10 states because of a court decision late last year. California Magistrate Judge Elizabeth Laporte limited the rule to apply to New Mexico and the nine states covered by the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals while lawsuits on the issue continue through the appeals process. Laporte made the decision after the Bush administration asked both her and U.S. District Judge Clarence Brimmer in Wyoming to at least temporarily lift or modify their conflicting decisions on the rule, saying the Forest Service faced a "Hobbesian choice" over which of the court orders to disobey.
Brimmer threw out the roadless rule in 2003, Laporte reinstated it in 2006, and Brimmer threw it out again last year. Only two states, Colorado and Idaho, embarked on the process the Bush administration put in place to petition for protections. If the Clinton rule is reinstated, the completed Idaho rule could stand, the groups said, but they predicted that Colorado would drop its unfinished efforts.
Changes will ensure our water is cleaner
From: Community.GJSentinel by DAVID NICKUM Executive Director Colorado Trout Unlimited
Gary Harmon’s article on the 2009 Clean Water Restoration Act quotes Sen. Michael Bennet as saying that the legislation “could block access to waters for sportsmen and fishermen.”
With all due respect, the senator has it exactly backwards. The CWRA would have absolutely no effect on the ability of hunters and anglers to access Colorado’s waters. But it would ensure that when they visit Colorado’s rivers and streams, they find clean, fishable waters that have been protected from pollutants and waste.
Most hunter and angler groups, including Trout Unlimited, Ducks Unlimited and the National Wildlife Federation, support the CWRA for a simple reason: It protects streams and wetlands that are critical habitat for fish and wildlife.
Far from being a federal power grab, CWRA would simply restore the protection that the Clean Water Act provided for 25 years before misguided court rulings declared open season on wetlands and waterways. In Colorado, 75 percent of our streams — 76,000 miles worth — are now at risk.
Field and Stream magazine recently called passage of the CWRA a top priority for hunters and anglers, because it protects “temporary and isolated wetlands, among the most important habitats for waterfowl and a host of other wildlife.”
If Colorado’s senators wish to defend the interests of sportsmen and women, they will support the Clean Water Restoration Act and ensure that our rivers and wetlands are safeguarded for future generations.
Outdoor groups back expanded Clean Water Act
By GARY HARMON/The Grand Junction Daily Sentinel Monday, May 25, 2009
Several sporting and conservation groups put a high priority on winning approval of the Clean Water Restoration Act.
Trout Unlimited, Ducks Unlimited, the Teddy Roosevelt Conservation Partnership and the National Wildlife Federation all list the measure, S 787 by Russ Feingold, D-Wis., as a major issue.
Opponents say the bill is prelude to a federal government overreach.
The bill would expand federal control to all the waters of the United States: interstate waters, intrastate lakes, rivers, streams, wetlands, mud flats, sand flats, sloughs, prairie potholes, wet meadows, playas and natural ponds, as well as tributaries to those waters.
Proponents of the measure say it would restore protections included in the 1972 Clean Water Act, which have since been torn down by court rulings.
The Trout Unlimited Web site said the act “would protect 20 million acres of wetlands and 2 million miles of rivers and streams that have lost protection in recent years because of misguided court rulings.”
http://www.gjsentinel.com/hp/content/news/stories/2009/05/25/052609_2A_Clean_Water_folo.html
Clean Water Restoration Act safeguards our rivers
Gary Harmon’s article on the 2009 Clean Water Restoration Act quotes Sen. Michael Bennet as saying that the legislation “could block access to waters for sportsmen and fishermen.” With all due respect, the senator’s spokesperson has it exactly backwards. The CWRA would have absolutely no effect on the ability of hunters and anglers to access Colorado’s waters — but it would ensure that when they visit Colorado’s rivers and streams, they find clean, fishable waters that have been protected from pollutants and waste. Most hunter and angler groups, including Trout Unlimited, Ducks Unlimited and the National Wildlife Federation, support the CWRA for a simple reason: It protects streams and wetlands that are critical habitat for fish and wildlife. Far from being a federal power grab, CWRA would simply restore the protection that the Clean Water Act provided for 25 years before misguided court rulings declared open season on wetlands and waterways. In Colorado, 75 percent of our streams – 76,000 miles worth – are now at risk. Field and Stream magazine recently called passage of the CWRA a top priority for hunters and anglers, because it protects “temporary and isolated wetlands, among the most important habitats for waterfowl and a host of other wildlife.”
If Colorado’s senators wish to defend the interests of sportsmen and women, they will support the Clean Water Restoration Act and ensure that our rivers and wetlands are safeguarded for future generations.
DAVID NICKUM, Executive Director Colorado Trout Unlimited Arvada
http://community.gjsentinel.com/2009/05/21/clean-water-restoration-act-safeguards-our-rivers/
Reservoir project reaching final stages
MINERAL COUNTY — The San Luis Valley Irrigation District (SLVID) is anticipating moving its Rio Grande Reservoir expansion project into the final design stage by “late fall or early 2010,” according to SLVID Supervisor Travis Smith. The district is currently consulting with the Colorado Division of Water Resources, the District 20 Water Commissioners, the Rio Grande Water Users Association, the Nature Conservancy and Trout Unlimited on the expansion project.
http://www.mineralcountyminer.com/V2_news_articles.php?heading=0&page=72&story_id=779
