Legislation and Advocacy

Groundwater overuse tied to fisheries

Trout Unlimited says the West has gone to the well too often to satisfy its thirst.

By CHRIS WOODKA THE PUEBLO CHIEFTAIN

COLORADO SPRINGS - Most fish don’t live underground, but the water there is as important as the rivers, streams and lakes they live in.

“It turns out fish need water every day,” Melinda Kassen, Trout Unlimited Western Water Project managing director told an audience of about 100 during a panel discussion on Colorado College’s 2007 State of the Rockies Report Card.

“River advocates are thinking more about wells. A significant amount of base flows in rivers is made up of groundwater,” Kassen said. “Riparian wetlands are in danger. It’s a threat to fish and birds on the flyway.”

Trout Unlimited issued a report called “Gone to the Well Once Too Often” about the importance of groundwater in the American West. It details how well pumping, if not regulated, can create economic and ecological disasters.

Some examples from the report:

One year ago, 440 wells in the South Platte basin irrigating 30,000 acres on 200 farms were shut down. Boulder, Highlands Ranch, Sterling and some senior water rights holders said the wells were cutting into their water supply. For some farmers, it will mean bankruptcy.

The headwaters of the Verde River in Arizona could be dried up by 2100 under a plan by Prescott to pump 2.8 billion gallons a year from its aquifer. Prescott is expecting its population to double by 2020 and water needs to increase fivefold by 2050. Arizona laws do not regulate most diversions of groundwater.

In Gallatin County, Montana, just north of Yellowstone National Park, subdivisions have tripled their rate of pumping in the last 20 years, causing Trout Unlimited, ranchers and the state to protest about diminished water supplies. The Montana Supreme Court just last year ruled that groundwater is connected to surface supplies.

New Mexico exempts small domestic wells from regulation, but requires permits. As many as 6,000 to 8,000 permits are issued each year.

“An over-reliance on groundwater impairs water quality and, in some areas, has led to land subsidence,” Kassen said.

Trout Unlimited’s concern primarily lies with the impact overpumping has on wildlife, which can be seen in all Western states, Kassen said. Wetlands have disappeared, rivers periodically run dry and headwaters streams that feed rivers have become dry washes.

Complicating the picture is the fact that groundwater regulation, like surface water laws, differs in every state.

“Weak groundwater regulation makes user conflicts worse,” Kassen said. “If we put the best of every state’s program together, we’d be in a lot better shape.”

Trout Unlimited’s report offers several solutions, stressing urban conservation, sustainable management that looks at all users, aquifer recharge and underground water banks.

In Colorado, augmentation plans - which replace surface water lost to pumping - should take into account real-world conditions, she added.

“The augmentation a court allows may not always be enough,” she said. “You may be moving water on paper, but not making any gains.”

Saga of the Black Canyon

From David Stillwell, National TU, Boulder The first link is an editorial from the Grand Junction Daily Sentinel followed by the second link which is Drew’s guest column response:

Walking on water as easy as solving canyon dispute

http://www.gjsentinel.com/opin/content/news/opinion/stories/2007/04/08/4_8_geocolumn_4_8_07.html

Black Canyon deal left door open to Front Range diversions

http://www.gjsentinel.com/opin/content/news/opinion/stories/2007/04/25/nu_gunnison_op_ed_WWW.html

State AG moves to gut Black Canyon accord

http://www.gjsentinel.com/search/content/news/stories/2007/04/17/4_17_1a_Black_Canyon_water.html

Water chief should be fired, lawmaker says

http://www.gjsentinel.com/search/content/news/stories/2007/04/18/4_18_1a_Black_Canyon.html

Legislators: Hold water project money until Black Canyon dispute resolved

http://www.gjsentinel.com/news/content/news/stories/2007/04/21/4_22_1a_Black_Canyon.html

State pulls canyon objections

http://www.gjsentinel.com/hp/content/news/stories/2007/04/26/4_26_1aBlack_CanyonWithdrawal.html

Roan Plateau Testimony - April 19, 2007

Kendrick Neubecker, Vice-President, Colorado Trout UnlimitedTestifying on behalf of Colorado Trout Unlimited, Colorado Wildlife Federation, Colorado Mountain Club

Thank you for this opportunity to testify.  I am here today to request that Congress deny funding for the Bureau of Land Management’s (BLM) program to lease critical fish and wildlife habitat in Colorado for oil and gas drilling over the objections of the local community, sportsmen, and outfitters.  This request specifically applies to a place known as the Roan Plateau in Northwest Colorado.

Northwestern Colorado and Northeastern Utah, as with other areas in the inter-mountain west, have experienced unprecedented energy development in the past few years.  This development is proceeding at an extremely rapid pace, causing equally unprecedented impacts and pressures to the communities, economies and landscapes of the region.  The Northwestern part of my state is, or was, one of the more remote and quiet areas of Colorado and the west.  No more.  Local towns are straining under the tremendous influx of workers and related industrial activity.  Ranches and many smaller properties are being torn apart.  The wildlife, rivers and streams, and the whole landscapes which were the economic foundation, and which the region will need to depend on again after this energy boom goes bust, are being savaged by the single minded pursuit of energy at all costs.  The pleas of landowners, businesses and local officials are being routinely disregarded and outright ignored by both the BLM and much of the industry.

In the past few years the BLM and Forest Service have opened thousands of square miles of public lands to energy leasing and development.  Many thousands of wells have been drilled.  Tens of thousands more are planned for leasing and drilling in the next few years.

I would like to make it clear that we are not categorically opposed to the development of domestic energy supplies, just to the single minded approach that is being taken that disregards all other values and uses of our public lands.  We feel that there are some places whose special values outweigh the need to sacrifice them to the booming frenzy of energy development.  Places like the Roan Plateau.

Drill pads and wells are not the only thing riding roughshod across this landscape.  Hundreds of miles of new roads and pipeline corridors, compressor stations, man-camps and the other infrastructure of this development are being built with abandon.  Piceance Creek Road, a once scenic little county road with a few ranch trucks and lost tourists now carries as much traffic as any major highway in a large urban industrial zone.  Indeed, that is what formerly rural and isolated northwest Colorado is rapidly becoming.  The deer and the antelope no longer play, they run for their lives.

In the midst of this energy development frenzy the Roan Plateau has been an island of refuge, until now.  The Roan Plateau lies atop some of the most dramatic cliff scenery in Colorado.  The Roan Plateau comprises a very small area by comparison to the rest of the public and private lands being thrown open in this overarching quest for energy development. 

Within this small area are some of the singularly most remarkable and unique natural creations in Colorado.  There is an abundance of deer and elk that spend summers on top of the Roan Plateau and for whom the cliff areas along the southern and eastern sides of the plateau provide essential winter range.  The top is a mix of rolling grassland, aspen and spruce forests and unique hanging gardens.  In three of the streams exists five very rare conservation populations of Colorado River Cutthroat Trout.  (A conservation population is defined as a reproducing and recruiting population of native cutthroat trout that is managed to preserve the historical genome and/or unique genetic, ecologic and/or behavioral characteristics within a specific population and within geographical units.  Three of these populations are 90% pure; two are 99% pure Colorado River Cutthroat trout).  On the western side these same streams tumble from the Roan as two of the highest waterfalls in Colorado.

In August of 2002 the BLM itself published a report; Roan Plateau: Evaluation of Proposed Areas of Critical Environmental Concern, which, for a government report, fairly gushes with enthusiasm for the natural features of the Roan Plateau.

For the Roan Cliffs area this report states that “…most importantly, the unroaded nature of the area provides a seclusion/security component among various habitat types that is important to many wildlife species.  This area provides transitional and winter range for big game and is one of the few areas where migration corridors exist from the top of the Roan Cliffs to the lower slopes.”  “The entire area…is critical to mule deer during severe winters…”

As for Trapper, Northwater and East Fork Parachute Creeks, home to the five conservation species of Colorado River Cutthroat trout, the report states unequivocally that “The BLM considers the entire watershed(s) in which these fish reside to be important to the long term functionality of vital ecosystem processes which maintain upland and stream habitats important to these fish.”  The report further states that “Conservation populations are important in the overall conservation of the species and are given the highest priority for management and protection.  These populations are unique and irreplaceable.

The East Fork Parachute Creek watershed also contains hanging garden seeps, with rare populations of various plant species, including ones listed as “BLM Sensitive”.  The Report also notes that this watershed meets the criteria for a Wilderness Study Area (WSA).  Indeed, the BLM found that 19,322 acres within the planning area have wilderness characteristics, yet has so far specifically precluded protection of these characteristics.

A month later, in September 2002, the BLM released the Roan Plateau Eligibility Report for the National Wild and Scenic Rivers System.  This report had similar findings to the previous ACEC report.  It found Trapper and Northwater Creeks, East Fork of Parachute Creek, JQS Gulch, Golden Castle Creek, First and Second Anvil Creeks, and East Middle Fork Parachute Creek all eligible and given preliminary classification for Wild & Scenic designation.  The report then clearly states that “When a river segment is determined to be eligible and given a preliminary classification, its identified outstandingly remarkable values shall be afforded adequate protection, subject to valid existing rights, and until the eligibility determination is superseded, management activities and authorized uses shall not be allowed to adversely affect either eligibility or the tentative classification from a wild area to a scenic area or a scenic area to a recreational river area.”  This means management protection from loss of the Outstanding Remarkable Values which make it eligible for designation in the first place.

Despite the unparalleled fish and wildlife habitat and scenic qualities of the Roan, the BLM has been moving forward with a plan to lease the area for oil and gas drilling. In August of last year, they released their Final Resource Management Plan Amendment and Environmental Impact Statement for the Roan Plateau Planning Area.

The Final Plan calls for a phased approach to the drilling activity and states that development will only disturb “at any one time … 350 acres, representing approximately 1% of the BLM lands on top of the plateau.”  This sounds well and good, but is very deceptive.  The impacts caused by habitat fragmentation will cover a far larger area when you consider the road and pipeline network as well as the “clustered” drilling facilities.  As a Wyoming Wildlife Biologist stated in 2002 about the activities in his state, “Think of the road network as a spiderweb.  Crush the spiderweb and roll it into a ball and it’s statistically insignificant, but fully extended it controls and dominates its entire area.  It’s the area of influence that matters, not the actual areas consumed.”  By the time all six phases have been completed the top of the Roan Plateau will look like any of the other gas fields.  This is simply a delayed death, an execution by degrees rather than all at once.

The Final report is also deceptive in some of its most critical language.  Take for example the stipulations of No Surface Occupancy/No Ground Disturbance (NSO/NGD).  These stipulations are offered as prescriptions that will be used to protect sensitive areas on the Roan.  But they do not really mean what they say.  NSO and NGD mean that no permanent occupation or disturbance can occur for longer than two years.  Roads and other facilities can be built, grading and wholesale re-arrangement of the landscape can occur, but if any structures are removed and the land is “re-claimed” it will be regarded by the BLM as if nothing at all had ever happened.  This is patently absurd and outrageous.  During that time a single accidental spill could wipe out an entire population of “unique and irreplaceable” trout.  That, by any definition, is a “disturbance”.

Beyond this, the stipulations and prescriptions provided as means for protecting the “unique and irreplaceable” features defined in the BLM’s earlier reports are all subject to administrative review.  They can be modified or even completely suspended at the request of the lessee.  This is hardly protection.  Water quality monitoring in particular is a stated “stipulation” that the BLM has been reluctant to require.

At the very end of the report the BLM concludes that regarding fish and wildlife resources, “Some areas of high quality wildlife habitat would be lost or permanently altered during construction of roads and oil and gas wells, and other ground disturbing activities.”  The largely meaningless special stipulations are then cited as protections and “would be implemented to reduce these losses.  However, any unavoidable losses would be essentially permanent, even with the best currently available restoration technology, because of the long time period (many decades to centuries) required to restore the natural assemblages of species, plant-soil and plant-animal interactions, and ecosystem functioning that make specific resource areas unique.  Some of these impacts could never be reversed, especially that eliminate genetically unique resources represented by populations of rare or disjunct species such as genetically pure Colorado River cutthroat trout.” 

BLM is ignoring their own commitment made to the recovery of these trout in the Conservation Agreement and Strategy for Colorado River Cutthroat Trout, in the States of Colorado, Utah and Wyoming.  This plan was developed as an alternative to listing the Colorado River Cutthroat trout under the Endangered Species Act.  Trout Unlimited has supported this so far successful interagency approach in lieu of listing.  TU may have to reconsider this position, especially for populations under the “protection” of the BLM.

The recommendation from this same agency four years earlier to “give the highest priority for management and protection” of these “unique and irreplaceable” populations are thrown out.  The Final Report of August 2006 clearly shows that the concerns and wishes of the local citizens are meaningless.  This small island of the Roan Plateau, a very special and unique place by the BLM’s own admission, is to be rolled over and become just another sacrificed landscape to the myopic and rapacious pursuit of energy.  The BLM has ignored all of their other responsibilities as stewards of public lands and focused on this single management prescription, trading its historic multiple use approach in favor of this single myopic dominant use. 

The local communities and economy depend heavily on places like the Roan Plateau for the hunting, fishing and recreation economies that they provide.  Once the wells are drilled and the pipelines are built we will be left holding the bag called “Bust” once again.  We need to truly protect and preserve places like the Roan Plateau and restore some small semblance of economic balance to the area.

The BLM is considering leasing areas on the Roan Plateau as early as this year.  They have given no response yet to the various protest letters and objections from the many organizations, citizens and local governments in the area.  At this point there has been no public discussion of the Final Resource Management Plan, a plan very different from the original alternatives put forth for public review and comment.

While this issue should ultimately be debated in the Natural Resources Committee, there is not time for Congress to weigh in short of a funding limitation.  We respectfully ask that Congress deny the BLM funding for any leasing activity that may be proposed for the Roan Plateau. A funding limitation will provide the necessary “time out” to adequately consider the resources at stake, the community concerns, and a reasonable path forward.  It will prevent the BLM from making irreversible commitments before any meaningful public and Congressional engagement on this Final Resource Management Plan and the unique resources of the Roan Plateau can occur.  Review of the Final Plan, which was completely different from any of the proposed alternatives, requires this. Given this time Congress will be able to adequately consider appropriate legislation for the protection of the Roan Plateau.

Again, thank you for this opportunity to testify and for listening to the concerns of a broad spectrum of people and communities in northwest Colorado, and Colorado as a whole.

Colorado Sportsmen's Caucus Meeting

For your information. Hope you might be able to attend. Both Rod Van Velson and I had the opportunity to meet with Ari Zavaras and discuss the current program between Corrections and DOW using inmate labor to do stream improvement in South Park. Eight miles have been completed. Rod's idea is to see the State (source of money undetermined, but a numbers of options exist) purchase $600,000 plus of equipment, which would be under the control of Corrections at Buena Vista. Inmates would be responsible for maintaining the equipment (learning a job skill) and operation of the equipment (heavy equipment certification) and the public gets vastly improved streams and fisheries. In addition to streams, other work could include projects on State Wildlife Areas, Parks and National Forests. The target Counties would initially be Park, Chaffee and Lake.

-----------------------------------------

Co Chairs

Senator Lois Tochtrop

and

Representative John Soper

invite you to

 

The Colorado Sportsmen’s Caucus Meeting

§        Thursday April 19 at noon

§        Senate Committee Room 356

§        Colorado State Capitol

 

Bring your lunch and settle in for a presentation by Rod VanVelson and Eddie Kochman on corrections inmates entering a DOW program to give them job skills and work experience AND (hopefully) a brief presentation by Gary Nichols, Park CO Tourism Director, on his landowner/fisherman pilot program.

 

Senator Lois Tochtrop: SenLoisTochtrop@aol.com (303) 866-4863

Representative John Soper: johnsoper235@comcast.net  (303) 866-2931

Colorado Water Project

Many rivers and streams in Colorado are heavily depleted and lack the flows necessary to sustain healthy coldwater fisheries. Since its inception in 1998, Trout Unlimited’s Colorado Water Project has worked to address this problem. The Water Project has defeated water diversion and storage projects that would diminish river flows, has helped to pass several pieces of legislation expanding the state instream flow program, and has created dialogue among water providers regarding ways to develop water supplies without damaging Colorado’s rivers and fisheries. Trout Unlimited is the only group in Colorado dedicated to conserving, protecting and restoring stream flows and rivers.

roaringfork-Schnitzer.jpg

Given Colorado’s population growth and weak laws and policies protecting rivers and fish, top priorities for the Colorado Water Project are to ensure that current legal protections for our rivers are not weakened or eliminated and to require new water development to proceed only if it will conserve, protect or restore the rivers that would otherwise be adversely affected.

  • Temperature Standards: In 2007 the Colorado Water Project and Colorado Trout Unlimited succeeded in gaining temperature standards for Colorado rivers. The Colorado Water Quality Control Commission approved new standards for water temperature at its January hearing, adopting standards that will protect Colorado fisheries for decades to come.
  • Black Canyon of the Gunnison: In 2006, the Water Project won a key legal battle to prevent the federal government from giving away much of its instream water right for the Black Canyon National Park to fuel more Front Range development.
  • AB Lateral: After a 20 year fight, in 2005 TU finally defeated the proposed AB Lateral Project, which would have taken more than 1000 cfs from the Gunnison River above the Black Canyon for hydropower development.
  • Bypass Flows: Since 1995, CTU and the Colorado Water Project have successfully led the fight to defend the current law that allows federal agencies to require minimum flows below water projects on federal lands; while the issue potentially affects more than 8,000 diversions on federal lands, the focal point is chronically-dewatered tributaries of Colorado’s only designated wild and scenic river, the Cache la Poudre.
  • Upper CO: In 2006, the Water Project secured better flows in the fabled Upper Colorado River after water diversions to the Front Range temporarily reduced flows to dangerously low levels; CTU and the Colorado Water Project are now working with the transbasin diverters and state and federal water managers to secure better year round flows and to ensure that new water diversions from the Fraser, Colorado and Blue rivers do not harm the rivers or their trout.
  • Recreational In-Channel Diversion Water Rights: Colorado law allows local governments to obtain legally recognized water rights for in-the-river recreational purposes, such as kayak courses; when traditional water users and the state challenged these limited rights in the Colorado courts and legislature, the Colorado Water Project joined with local communities and recreational interests to defend them.
  • Dry Legacy: In 2002 and 2003, the Water Project released reports demonstrating the impacts of dewatering on 10 rivers across the state; in response to this report and the outreach effort accompanying it, CTU and the Colorado Water Project secured several improvements in state water law, including a provision that allows the CWCB to acquire water rights that restore streams (and not just maintain minimum flows) and other provisions that make it easier to leave water in rivers during periods of drought.
  • Advocating for Expansion of the State’s Instream Flow Program: In Colorado, private parties cannot lease water to improve instream flows. The Colorado Water Project is beginning to work with elected officials and water users to discuss the possibility of legislation that would create a private leasing program for Colorado.

While much of the focus of the Colorado Water Project involves defending the state’s rivers from new water withdrawals and expanding the tools and incentives to conserve the state’s rivers, TU also focuses on on-the-ground protection and restoration efforts. These projects broaden the coalition of interests that support instream flows and act as an incubator for building stronger communities with more interest in river protection.

  • CWCB Appropriations: The Water Project works with local TU chapters and others to recommend new instream flow water rights to the Colorado Water Conservation Board, currently the only entity in the state authorized to hold in-river water rights to preserve the environment. We also work with the CWCB to protect the water rights that state agency has already acquired.
  • Water Rights Acquisitions: Colorado Water Project staff works with TU chapters and private landowners to identify water rights holders willing to use their water rights in ways that allow additional stream flows when fish need it most. We also work on agreements under which senior water rights are donated to the CWCB instream flow program and can provide legal assistance and technical expertise for specific habitat and flow restoration projects.
  • Future Focus Areas: Using new legal tools and the state’s heightened recognition of the importance of instream flows, TU hopes to launch a major watershed restoration project by 2010, working primarily with private landowners to voluntarily improve habitats and flow conditions

In a state where the competing demands for limited water resources are enormous and continually growing, building political support for instream flows is critical. The public, elected officials and agencies need to understand how important healthy rivers and fisheries are to Colorado’s economy and quality of life. We are optimistic that our work will provide a roadmap to healthier rivers with abundant flows, and healthier communities that are vested in the long-term protection of their watersheds.

Ritter says roadless petition won’t supersede current protections

By BOBBY MAGILL The Daily Sentinel

Sunday, April 15, 2007

Gov. Bill Ritter on Saturday reiterated his support for broad protections now in place for Colorado’s roadless areas.

Ritter said the intent of a letter he sent to the U.S. Department of Agriculture last week was to ensure the areas remain protected if the 2001 Roadless Rule gets struck down in federal court.

Ritter sent a petition to the U.S. Department of Agriculture last week asking the agency to protect Colorado’s roadless areas while also honoring the work of the Colorado Roadless Area Review Task Force, which recommended last year that some exceptions be made to some roadless protections, allowing for some coal mining, wildfire prevention and some other activities.

The 2001 Roadless Rule, which now protects all of the nation’s 58.5 million acres of roadless land, is being challenged in federal court.

“I didn’t mean to presume that (the 2001 Roadless Rule) wouldn’t be upheld,” said Ritter, who was in Palisade for the unveiling Saturday of a memorial to Wayne N. Aspinall. “I just think that on the chance that it’s not, and I think there’s some chance that it’s not, that we must do all we can to try and get interim protections (for roadless areas) in place and agreed upon if that rule might be struck down.”

Ritter said the Colorado roadless rule he proposed in his letter to the USDA will not supersede the 2001 Roadless Rule if it prevails in court.

Some conservationists, including Brian O’Donnell of Trout Unlimited, said last week they feared Ritter was asking the USDA to weaken protections for roadless areas even if the 2001 rule remains in effect.

“The 2001 Roadless Rule, if it’s upheld by the courts, that’s the law of the land,” Ritter said.